Adenomyoepithelioma of the Breast: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation and Management.

Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) is a rare, usually benign breast neoplasm with low potential for malignant transformation. Imaging features are nonspecific and overlap with other benign and malignant breast lesions. On mammography, AME most often presents as a mass, usually oval in shape, with variable reported margins. Less commonly, AME can present mammographically as an asymmetry or can be mammographically occult. Associated calcifications are uncommon. On US, AME is usually seen as a hypoechoic oval mass, but it can also manifest as a complex cystic and solid mass. On US, the majority of AME have noncircumscribed margins (indistinct, angular, or microlobulated). Internal vascularity is usually present, and posterior enhancement can be seen. Although there is limited literature on MRI features, the most frequent finding is an irregular mass with washout kinetics; T2 hyperintensity can be observed. These nonspecific and often suspicious imaging features usually merit biopsy. On histologic analysis, AME is characterized by a biphasic proliferation of myoepithelial and epithelial cells. Pathologic diagnosis can be difficult due to the variety of histologic features of AME and heterogeneity in these tumors, especially when sampling is limited, such as in core needle biopsies. Wide local surgical excision of AME is recommended due to potential for recurrence and malignant transformation.

Ultrasound and pathology findings of adenomyoepithelioma in the breast: a case report.

.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with unusual confounding diagnostic feature: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast is an uncommon subtype of breast neoplasm that occurs in adults over a wide age range but most commonly in middle-aged and older adults. It usually presents as a solitary palpable mass or is detected on breast radiographic images. Histologically, it is a biphasic tumor with proliferation of both the epithelial and myoepithelial components of the glands, with variable types of tissue metaplasia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old Saudi woman who underwent regular breast screening (mammogram) presented to our hospital following radiographic detection of a suspicious grouped microcalcification in the upper outer quadrant of her right breast on the mammogram. A wide local excision of the right breast lump was performed. Following histopathological examination of the breast lump, the final diagnosis was breast adenomyoepithelioma with mucoepidermoid/divergent differentiation, with no evidence of malignancy. About two years after the operation, a clinical follow-up conducted outside our hospital showed the development of ductal carcinoma in situ in the same breast. CONCLUSION: Although the prognosis and the plan of treatment remains the same, our case highlights the complexities in making an accurate diagnosis between the various types of metaplasia within adenomyoepithelioma on one hand and the presence of mucoepidermoid differentiation in adenomyoepithelioma on the other.

Breast adenomyoepithelioma from a radiologic perspective.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast (AB) is an uncommon tumor that is characterized by the biphasic proliferation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells. The radiologic findings for AB have been scantly reported. This paper aims to analyze the characteristic findings for AB on ultrasonography (US) and mammography. This retrospective descriptive study used the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) to analyze the US and mammography findings for histologically confirmed AB in patients attended at our institution between 2007 and 2019. We identified a total of 13 AB in 13 women. All patients underwent US. On US, 12 lesions were seen as oval nodules, and the remaining lesion was irregular-shaped; 8 lesions had circumscribed margins, 3 had angled margins, and 2 had microlobulated margins. Regarding the echo pattern, 8 lesions were hypoechoic and 5 were complex (solid-cystic). On color Doppler, 11 lesions were vascularized nodules and 2 were avascular nodules. In conclusion, we present the imaging characteristics for a series of cases of AB. It is unlikely that this lesion can be suspected solely on the basis of the imaging findings; nevertheless, it is important for radiologists to be familiar with AB to carry out a good radiopathologic correlation.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: a rare diagnosis complicated by surgical emergency and diagnostic uncertainty.

A woman in her 80s was referred as an emergency case with a large oedematous and ulcerating lesion of the right breast. There was a 5-month history of increasing breast volume with new onset skin breakdown and discharge. Imaging revealed an extensive heterogeneous mass requiring drainage. No diagnosis was received from multiple biopsies and immediate surgical resection of the breast and axillary sampling was prioritised given the deteriorating patient condition. Postoperative histology identified a biphasic Adenomyoepithelioma of low malignant potential, a rare presentation compounding the complexity of management. The diagnostic uncertainty of this case highlighted the importance of MDT collaboration and the flexibility of current management pathways when dealing with cases requiring urgent surgical intervention. Axillary sampling in the context of unsuccessful preoperative biopsy represented a comprehensive means for assessing the need for further surgical or systemic management in the context of unconfirmed malignancy in a deteriorating patient.

Establishment and characterization of organoids from a patient with adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.

Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast is a rare tumor that is composed of proliferating epithelial and myoepithelial cells. The pathogenesis of AME remains unclear, and no breast cancer cells have been identified in such tumor tissues. In this study, we established patient-derived breast cancer organoids from the surgical tumor samples of an elderly Chinese woman with an AME of the breast. Our findings confirmed the successful establishment of organoids from an AME of the breast of this patient. A short tandem repeat analysis revealed that the DNA signature of the AME of the breast organoids matched the DNA signature of the original tumor specimen. Moreover, diameter assay confirmed that the organoids from the breast AME showed sensitivity to paclitaxel and doxorubicin treatments, which was similar to, but lesser than that of primary culture cells. In conclusion, we established an efficient 3-dimensional breast cancer organoid culture platform from an AME of the breast. This platform can be effectively used for exploring clinicopathological and genomic characteristics of AME of the breast to identify possible treatments and increase awareness about this disease entity.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with prominent cystic changes: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast is a rare subtype of breast tumor. Most of AMEs reported are solid, however, cystic or prominent cystic changes are extremely rare. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old woman presented a lump in the upper outer quadrant of right breast, and it was accompanied by continuous breast pain and bilateral axillary itching for more than 2 months. There were no other symptoms found. Preoperative mammography and ultrasound examination were performed. Mammography showed a noncalcified lobulated mass, and it was considered to be a benign cyst with septum on ultrasound, but ductal carcinoma of breast, adenoid cystic carcinoma could not be excluded. At first, AME was not considered preoperatively, because the imaging features of this rare tumor may vary widely, which may result in an incorrect diagnosis. But eventually, AME was diagnosed by postoperative pathology and immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: We herein present a rare case of breast AME with prominent cystic changes. AME has no-specific imaging features, but the benign or malignant nature of the lesion might be suspected on imaging.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: Case series and literature review.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast is a rare tumor consisting of both epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Malignant transformation of either cell line can occur. We describe the imaging features, clinical presentation, and management of seven cases of biopsy-proven adenomyoepithelioma at our institution.

Clinical presentation, national practice patterns, and outcomes of breast adenomyoepithelioma.

Breast adenomyoepithelioma (AME) is a rare tumor with the published literature mainly in the form of case reports. Thus, there is currently only limited published data to guide evidence-based management. We sought to use a large, contemporary US database to evaluate how these patients are managed and describe expected outcomes. The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2013) for women with AME. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS) and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Overall, 110 patients were analyzed. At diagnosis, the median age was 67 years and the median tumor size was 2.0 cm. All but four patients had node-negative disease. A majority (55%) of tumors were estrogen receptor negative, and only one was positive for HER2/neu. The most common surgical procedure was lumpectomy (60%); a minority (10.9%) of subjects underwent complete axillary nodal dissection, with one-quarter not undergoing pathologic nodal sampling. Chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiotherapy were utilized in a minority of patients (26%, 8%, and 36%, respectively), and none were associated with OS. At median follow-up of 52 months, the 5-year OS for the entire population was 74.4%. Disease-related characteristics and practice patterns are described for AME, the largest study of this rare tumor to date. Resection is the most important aspect of management, and based on this dataset the low rate of nodal involvement suggests that in some cases nodal sampling could be safely omitted. Adjuvant therapy may be considered on a case-by-case basis. Taken together, these data provide valuable insight into a rare neoplasm that may better inform management of these patients.

A Case of Adenomyoepithelioma of the Breast Showing Strong Uptake of 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose on a Positron Emission Tomography.

An adenomyoepithelioma of the breast is a rare tumor characterized by biphasic proliferation of both epithelial and myoepithelial cells. This tumor is generally considered as a benign neoplasm, and there are few reports describing the imaging features of this tumor through 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Here, we report a case of an adenomyoepithelioma that showed strong uptake of FDG on PET similar to that observed with a malignant tumor. A 73-year-old woman presented to our hospital with a 3.5-cm, mobile, and elastic hard tumor in the upper area of the left breast. Although the findings of mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging suggested that the tumor was malignant, it was diagnosed as an adenomyoepithelioma by core needle biopsy. An invasive ductal carcinoma, 0.5-cm in size, was detected in the medial upper area of the ipsilateral breast during an examination. Although FDG-PET demonstrated no lymph node or distant metastases from the invasive ductal carcinoma, strong uptake of FDG was detected in the adenomyoepithelioma. Breast conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for the invasive ductal carcinoma together with resection of the adenomyoepithelioma was performed. A diagnosis of adenomyoepithelioma was confirmed through histologic examination of the resected specimen. This case indicates that some adenomyoepitheliomas may show a strong uptake of FDG on PET, which resembles a malignant tumor.

Breast adenomyoepithelioma and adenomyoepithelioma with carcinoma (malignant adenomyoepithelioma) with associated breast malignancies: A case series emphasizing histologic, radiologic, and clinical correlation.

The 2012 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of breast tumors distinguishes adenomyoepitheliomas (AMEs) as benign tumors composed of a biphasic proliferation of phenotypically variable myoepithelial cells around small epithelial lined spaces. Many AMEs have demonstrated benign behavior and are often cured with excision with negative margins, but some have exhibited malignant transformation of the myoepithelial cells, ductal epithelial cells, or both. When one of the components is histologically malignant, it is termed AME with carcinoma. Due to the rarity, the literature correlating imaging, histology, and clinical outcome is limited. A retrospective review was undertaken. A review of an institutional pathology database identified 14 cases with AME or malignant AME. Most AMEs had nonspecific imaging findings and were categorized as Bi-Rads 4. Histologic features of AME did not correlate with prior or concurrent breast malignancies or any radiographic features. Clinical follow up could be obtained for all but one case (mean follow up time = 75 months). 5 cases had no known treatment post-biopsy and 5 patients received mastectomy. No recurrences were noted. 3/13 cases of benign AME had associated breast malignancies including invasive ductal adenocarcinoma and ductal carcinoma in-situ. 1 case of malignant AME had a synchronous separate malignant phyllodes tumor. Given the unclear and unpredictable propensity for malignant transformation, conservative excision with negative margins currently seems appropriate.

The mammography and MRI manifestations of adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.

AIM: To investigate mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations of benign and malignant adenomyoepithelioma (AME), in order to improve our understanding of this disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (11 cases of benign AME and two cases of malignant AME) were included. All patients underwent preoperative mammography, and four underwent preoperative MRI examinations. RESULTS: Mammography revealed that 11 cases showed round, lobulate, or oval masses. One case was accompanied by calcification with blurred edges; the remaining 10 cases showed masses with clear or shaded borders. One case exhibited structurally distorted lesions, and another showed focal opacities. Among the four patients who also underwent preoperative MRI examinations, signals in the three benign cases were clearly enhanced homogeneously, and the dynamic enhancement curves were progressive. The one case of malignant AME showed an irregularly shaped mass with spiculate margins on the MRI images. The signals were homogeneously enhanced, and the dynamic enhancement curve was of the washout type. CONCLUSION: AME usually exhibited oval or round masses with smooth edges and no calcification, and, in a portion of the cases, structurally distorted lesions or focal opacities. On different MRI sequences, AME usually showed homogeneous signal. The apparent diffusion coefficient value of malignant AME is relatively low.

[Adenomyoepithelioma with dominant myoepithelial contingent of the breast: A case report and literature review]. / Adénomyoépithéliome avec contingent myoépithélial prédominant du sein : à propos d'une observation et revue de la littérature.

We report a case of adenomyoepithelioma with predominant myoepithelial quota, a rare tumor of the breast due to proliferation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells in a patient of 71 years. This lesion, with difficult radiological and pathological diagnosis (biopsy) in the initial stage of the treatment, should benefit from surgical resection in healthy margin. In fact, this tumor is evolving in most cases on a benin mode, but cases of local or metastatic recurrences were reported. Histological and immunohistochemical arguments are important to reach the final diagnosis.

Imaging features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the imaging features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with a focus on sonographic (US) appearances. METHODS: Ten benign adenomyoepitheliomas in 9 patients were included in this study. Mammographic and US findings were analyzed retrospectively by 2 radiologists according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. The BI-RADS final assessment category was also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 8 lesions for which mammography was available, 4 lesions presented with abnormal findings. Two lesions presented with an indistinct, irregular, isodense mass and a circumscribed, oval, isodense mass. The other 2 lesions presented with areas of focal asymmetry and asymmetry, respectively. On US, all of 10 lesions presented as a mass. The masses measured 0.5-1.2 cm (mean, 0.8 cm), were irregular (n = 8) or oval (n = 2) with microlobulated (n = 5), indistinct (n = 3), or angular (n = 2) margins. They were all hypoechoic, had non parallel orientation in 6 cases, and increased peripheral vascularity in 7 cases. The BI-RADS final assessment category was 4B in 6, and 4A in 4. CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic findings of benign adenomyoepithelioma were nonspecific. An irregular, non parallel orientation, microlobulated or indistinct margin, hypoechogenicity, and increased peripheral vascularity were the most frequent US features.

Ultrasonographic features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ultrasonographic features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2009, five patients had histologically confirmed adenomyoepithelioma of the breast. We retrospectively evaluated the ultrasonographic findings of the tumors in correlation with the pathology, and reviewed medical records. RESULTS: The clinical manifestations included a palpable mass in three patients, while mammographic screening helped detect abnormalities in two patients. Ultrasonograms showed masses with an oval (n = 3) or irregular (n = 2) shape, with uncircumscribed (n = 4) or relatively well-circumscribed (n = 1) margins, as well as with a hypoechoic (n = 3) or a complex echoic (n = 2) internal echo texture. Three patients had focal ductectasia adjacent to the mass. The ultrasonographic assessments were classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4A, with low suspicion of malignancy in two cases, and as category 4B, with intermediate suspicion of malignancy in three cases. The pathology revealed benign adenomyoepithelioma in all patients. CONCLUSION: Benign adenomyoepitheliomas appear as solid or complex echoic masses with suspicious malignant ultrasonographic features, which may be associated with adjacent ductectasia. Although adenomyoepithelioma is a rare breast tumor, awareness of its sonographic features will be helpful for the differential diagnosis from other tumors.